An extension you relied on was abandoned.
Useful signal: the tool name, what you used it for, what broke, and what replacement attempts failed.
EXFILTR Lab is the intake layer for broken, abandoned, bloated, or missing browser workflows. We investigate requests, group similar signals, and may rebuild high-demand utilities when the scope is narrow enough to do well.
Tell us what stopped working, got too heavy, disappeared, or never existed in the simple form you needed. This is not custom development on demand. It is a public signal intake layer for deciding what EXFILTR should investigate next.
Useful signal: the tool name, what you used it for, what broke, and what replacement attempts failed.
Useful signal: the original simple workflow, which features made it worse, and what permissions or account requirements now feel excessive.
Useful signal: browser, extension, failure mode, and whether other users are asking for the same replacement.
Useful signal: the one job it did, how often you used it, and why modern replacements do too much or miss the point.
Useful signal: links to Reddit threads, Chrome Web Store reviews, public issue threads, or posts where people describe the same gap.
EXFILTR favors browser-native utilities with clear workflows, minimal permissions, local-first behavior where practical, and low maintenance burden.
Do not send passwords, private account data, customer records, API keys, recovery phrases, personal documents, or anything sensitive.
Send only the workflow problem, links to public evidence if available, and why current alternatives fail.
A structured request form may be added after the intake fields, privacy copy, spam protection, and rate limits are ready. For now, email keeps the workflow simple and avoids collecting unnecessary data.
Priority or private utility builds may be considered later, but there is no pricing, guaranteed delivery, or custom development offer on this page.
No EXFILTR product is marked live on this page. Install buttons appear only after public availability is verified.
Browser working-memory recovery and backup/export work. The internal prototype exists for local review, restore-flow QA, and session-loss anxiety reduction.
Browser-native readability workflow infrastructure. V1 scope is activeTab-first and user-triggered, but no public extension is launched.
PasteClean, ManualSuspend, LinkSweep, and other concepts remain validation or watchlist candidates until demand, permission scope, and maintenance burden are clear.
A product is not treated as available until the release state says it is available.
A workflow, category, or complaint cluster is being studied. No product commitment exists.
There is enough signal to track, but not enough to scope or build.
The problem, permission posture, boundaries, and first workflow are clear enough to review.
A reviewable internal version exists. It is not a public launch or installable claim.
Permissions, privacy, performance, copy, and failure modes are being checked.
Human approval is required before launch, Chrome Web Store submission, or public publishing.
The product is public only after availability, policy copy, privacy posture, and links are verified.
The concept failed a trust, maintenance, retention, monetization, or platform-risk gate.
EXFILTR studies abandoned extensions, migration waves, MV2/MV3 casualties, redesign backlash, pricing backlash, and trust collapse. Public summaries stay factual and source-aware.
Some ideas have demand but fail EXFILTR's trust, maintenance, permissions, monetization, or browser-native filters.
The permission registry explains what products need, what they do not touch, and how local-first behavior works.
Extensions should solve one browser workflow clearly before they grow into anything larger.